|
|
Caught Speeding In Scotland |
Use the form on this page to tell us about your
case and we will tell you what you can expect.
Tell us the points on your licence at present,
what the alleged speed was, what the limit was and where did it
happen. We will get back to you within 6 hours (often less)
We win speeding cases frequently
and even receive instructions from fellow solicitors in such
cases. Speeding in Scotland is a serious issue, it can
mean the loss of your licence and worse still, your livelihood.
Speeding cases in Scotland are dealt with in a
wide manner of ways between the different Sheriffdoms therefore
experience is essential when it comes to advising clients on the
best way of dealing with a speeding case. We believe that we are
different from many other firms in Scotland. We deal exclusively
with road traffic law and we use the internet to inform
ourselves and keep our clients updated regularly. This will be
used to give you the competitive advantage in your speeding
case.
We use e-mail extensively so that you can
obtain immediate responses and we can exchange documents such as
driving licences, insurance documents etc. This can very
important in speeding cases in Scotland as vital case papers are
often served on an accused and if he is to have a hope of
winning his case he needs to have that document in the hands of
his lawyer within a few days.
We subscribe to Lexis Nexis, and Westlaw the
biggest searchable law databases in the UK. We have 24/7 access
to every piece of legislation applicable in the UK and we have
access to every influential case that has ever been decided.
We have our own, exclusive, in house Knowledge
Base, with recent, unreported cases. We do all of this to keep
our team ahead of the competition.
We are the only firm in the UK to have ever
visited the GATSO Camera factory in Holland.
We have the experience, skill and expertise
to enable us to win your case and we know that results speak
louder than words. Please see
what
our clients have said about us recently.
Please do not hesitate to telephone or e-mail
us regarding your case.
SPEEDING
The flash of a GATSO camera in your rear view mirror is often
the start of that sinking feeling that lets you know that your
licence may be jeopardy. That is probably when the worry sets
in. If no formal notice, termed a Notice of Intended Prosecution
is received within 14 days. (Exceptions being where it is a
company car or a hire car) then you can stop worrying as you are
required to receive such a notice within 14 days of the
contravention.
In the event that the Procurator Fiscal’s office seek to
initiate proceedings in the absence of any NIP (Notice of
Intended Prosecution) then objection should be taken at the
first calling of the case. Successfully defending a charge of
"speeding" in Scotland is a technical job and it needs
someone with the knowledge, experience and court craft to win.
The
NIP can be issued verbally by Police Officers if you have the
misfortune of being stopped by the Police at the time. In cases
where injury or damage to property has occurred then the
requirement for an NIP does not apply.
We
often advise clients to make no comment when questioned by the
police, beyond the formal details, of name, address and
sometimes, date of birth.
In
road traffic cases, the accused person, if required under
Section 172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, is obliged to give
information, within his knowledge about the identity of a driver
of the vehicle involved in any such incidents. Failure to
provide such information constitutes a separate offence. The
European Court of Human Rights decided that drivers do not
have a right of silence and ARE required to answer the
identity question in terms of Section 172 of the Road Traffic
Act. "Failure to provide", attracts a 6 penalty point
endorsement.
After the "speeding" matter has been reported to the
Procurator Fiscal's office, proceedings are likely to be
initiated by way of summary complaint. (Citation) The validity
of a complaint depends upon a number of factors. Typographical
errors can generally be disregarded, however more fundamental
errors can bring the case to an abrupt end if challenged at the
correct stage of proceedings. A fundamental nullity such as the
particular court having no jurisdiction in the case or the case
being "time barred" cannot be amended and will vitiate
proceedings. Issues such as jurisdiction, time bar and
competency can be complex and can have a significant bearing on
how the case proceeds. Therefore the knowledge of
an experienced solicitor is invaluable at this
stage.
The
dramatic rise in speeding prosecutions and the increasing
number of speed cameras and traps peppered around the country
means that we now have more people than ever before with live
penalty points on their licence. Points are relevant from date
of offence to date of offence.
Mistakes can be made at the most basic level. In one of our
cases, it became apparent that the distance allegedly travelled
had been underestimated by approximately one third, thus
producing an enhanced speed measurement. We sent out our trainee
solicitor, Martin Black to measure the distance and were amazed
that indeed this was the case. The Crown deserted the case on
the basis of the evidence that we could then present to them. No
need for the time, inconvenience and expense of a trial!

Avoiding disqualification
Where
a driver, accumulates 12 or more points in 3 year period, he/she
will be liable for a mandatory disqualification period of 6
months.
If you
have 9 points on your driving licence and they were imposed
within three years of the present offence (From date of offence
to date of offence) then you are liable to be disqualified under
the ‘Totting Up Procedure’.
However,
all is not lost. You may be able to argue that ‘Exceptional
Hardship’ would occur if you lost your licence.
The
hardship must be "exceptional". If you can persuade the court
that others, not just you, would suffer badly – for example,
that they would lose their job or business, or be unable to pay
their mortgage – then you might persuade the court to impose the
points but refrain from disqualification. It is extremely
difficult to persuade the court not to impose the
disqualification. A proof is normally set and you would require
to bring evidence of the exceptional hardship to court. This may
be the evidence of an accountant, an employee, medical records
etc etc We would suggest that you really need experienced legal
assistance to successfully present such cases.
If you have a
speeding case pending please call 0800 612 9597 or
email
gw@roadtrafficlaw.com for FREE advice and an online case
consultation
|