Sentencing Guidelines Scotland

Every case depends upon its own facts and circumstances and the personalities in the court where your case will be heard. For an informed discussion and advice on what you may expect by way of sentence in your own case just call us on 0800 612 9597 or go online to www.roadtrafficlaw.com/ask_a_lawyer.htm

There are no sentencing guidelines currently in existence in Scotland. In other jurisdictions like England the Magistrates are issued with guidance on sentencing.

Sentencing is a matter for the judge at first instance, who will consider each case on its own merits.

The judge’s discretion is tempered by statute – which may provide for particular sentencing options, and occasionally, mandatory sentences – and the decisions of the Appeal Court.

Section 197 of the 1995 Act, headed, “Sentencing Guidelines”, provides: “Without prejudice to any rule of law, a court in passing sentence shall have regard to any relevant opinion pronounced under section 118(7) or section 189(7) of this Act”. Sections 118(7) and 189(7) empower the Appeal Court, when disposing both solemn and summary appeals, to pronounce an opinion on the sentence or other disposal or order which is appropriate in any similar case. The Appeal Court has apparently seldom used this power to issue “advisory judgments” on sentencing matters.

 

Why

 

The sentencing system in Scotland has the advantage of being flexible and fair: each sentence will be tailored to the specific circumstances of the offence and the offender. The sentencing process is wholly undertaken by an independent judge who will have heard all the relevant evidence.

 

Developments

 

Recent research has found that although there is little evidence of widespread inconsistency in sentencing in Scotland, there is nonetheless a general perception of inconsistency.

Consistency in sentencing is seen as an essential part of fairness and justice: “like cases should be treated alike”. Consistent sentencing which is transparent and predictable is said to be important to maintain public confidence in the justice system. It also allows practitioners to provide better advice to their clients.

The Scottish Government has produced a consultation paper, Sentencing Guidelines and a Scottish Sentencing Council: Consultation and Proposals (September 2008) in which the establishment of a statutory sentencing advisory body – a Scottish Sentencing Council (SSC) – is proposed. The SSC’s main function would be to prepare draft sentencing guidelines for approval by the Appeal Court. Consultation closes on 21 November 2008. This paper followed a report by The Sentencing Commission for Scotland, The Scope to Improve Consistency in Sentencing (2006), which had made similar recommendations.

  

 The Position In England

General

 

The Sentence Guidelines Council (SGC), advised by the Sentencing Advisory Panel, is responsible under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 for producing sentencing guidelines. Before the SGC was established, the Court of Appeal had responsibility for producing sentencing guidance.

Guidelines are produced for particular offences and classes of offences as well as on overarching principles, and issues such as reduction in sentence for a plea of guilty.

 

Road Traffic Offences

 

Most of the relevant SGC guidance on road traffic matters is contained in the current Magistrates’ Guidelines (also produced by the SGC), which has a section on motoring offences (pp 117-140).

Each offence (or class of offence) has its own separate guideline which charts the reasoning process that magistrates should follow when sentencing as well as giving a suggested appropriate range of sentences depending on the circumstances of the particular offence.

The guidelines are generally structured as follows:

 

1.       Name of offence and statutory provision

2.       Statement of statutory minimum or maximum; whether statute provides any mandatory sentence

3.       Reasoning process to be followed

·         Form preliminary view of the appropriate sentence

 Appropriate starting point

Circumstances of the offence – starting point – range

 

Effect of aggravating/mitigating factors

Non-exhaustive lists of factors indicating higher or lower culpability

·         Consider offender mitigation (circumstances of offender)

·         Consider guilty plea reduction

·         Consider ancillary orders

·         Decide sentence and give reasons

 

The full version of the Guidelines is available at: http://www.sentencing-guidelines.gov.uk/docs/magistrates_court_sentencing_guidelines_update.pdf

  

Extracts from Magistrates’ Guidelines – Road Traffic Offences 

The following tables are extracted from the current Guidelines and show starting points and ranges for common road traffic offences according to the circumstances of the offence. They do not reproduce the guideline for any particular offence in full. Reference is made to bands of fines: the approach to financial penalties is dealt with in detail in the Guidelines at pp 147 et seq.
 

Excess alcohol (drive/attempt to drive) (s 5(1)(a) RTA 1988)

  

Alcohol level			Starting point	Range	Disq	Disq if  2nd offence in 10 years
Breath (mg)	Blood (ml)	Urine (ml)
36-59	81-137	108-183	Band C fine	Band C fine	12-16 months	36-40 months
60-89	138-206	184-274	Band C fine	Band C fine	17-22 months	36-46 months
90-119	207-275	275-366	Medium level community order	Low level community order - high level community order	23-28 months	36-52 months
120-150 and above	276-345 and above	364-459 and above	12 weeks custody	High level community order to 26 weeks custody	29-36 months	36-60 months

 

 

Dangerous driving (s 2 RTA 1988)

 

Examples of nature of activity	Starting point	Range
Single incident where little or no damage or risk of personal injury	Medium level community order	Low level community order   Disqualify 12-15 months
Incident(s) involving excessive speed or showing off, especially on busy roads or in built up area   OR   Single incident where little or no damage or risk of personal injury but offender was disq driver	12 weeks custody	High level community order to 26 weeks custody   Disqualify 15-24 months
Prolonged bad driving involving deliberate disregard for safety of others   OR   Incident(s) involving excessive speed or showing off, especially on busy roads or built up area, by disq driver   OR   Driving as described in box above while being pursued by police	Crown Court	Crown Court

 

 

Speeding (s 89(10) RTRA 1984)

 

Speed limit (mph)	Recorded speed (mph)
20	21-30	31-40	41-50
30	31-40	41-50	51-60
40	41-55	56-65	66-75
50	51-65	66-75	76-85
60	61-80	81-90	91-100
70	71-90	91-100	101-110
Starting point	Band A fine	Band B fine	Band B fine
Range	Band A fine	Band B fine	Band B fine
Points/disq	3 pts	4-6 pts OR disq 7-28 d	Disq 7-56 d OR 6 pts