Ask a Traffic lawyer
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
lawsociety

 
kindle

Testimonials


I just wan to say thank you for keeping me on the road. It is a massive relief to know that I will not be banned after months of waiting for my trial.
, Dumbarton Sheriff

Having been charged with speeding on the A9 at 105 mph I had no idea how to proceed with my court summons until I contacted Roadtrafficlaw.com. I called them up and Graham Walker explained how the fee structure worked. It was straight forward advice and I was assured they would do their utmost to reduce the speed to a lower penalty as I was facing a ban.
, Inverness Justice of the Peace Court
Road Traffic Lawyers is rated 5/5 based on 63 testimonials.

IN-THE-MEDIA

penalty_points

Exceptional Hardship

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO RECEIVE OUR 30 PAGE E BOOK ON EXCEPTIONAL HARDSHIP PLEASE COMPLETE THE CONTACT FORM TO THE RIGHT OF THIS PAGE AND TYPE THE WORDS “E-BOOK Offer”

In the meantime here are some basics on the subject:-

When Will A Court Accept Exceptional Hardship And Not Disqualify?

Exceptional hardship is only relevant when you are disqualified under the ”totting up” provisions. If you accumulate 12 or more points on your licence within a period of three years, then you will automatically be disqualified from driving for a period of six months (or longer if you have been disqualified before).

However, it is possible to reduce the length of disqualification or even remove it altogether if there are mitigating circumstances. Simply saying to the court that the disqualification will cause hardship is not enough. It is thought that disqualification would normally cause hardship, and is part of the penalty. Only if you can show that the hardship is exceptional will the court consider that the penalty should be reduced. The courts interpret this strictly exceptional hardship must be something out of the ordinary.

What could amount to exceptional hardship in any given case depends on the circumstances. If you can show that the disqualification would also cause hardship to others ”for example family members, work colleagues or employees, or others who rely on you, such as ill or infirm relatives” then this will certainly be in your favour. In one case, a self-employed painter and decorator argued that a disqualification would result in his business failing (resulting in hardship to him and his family) and his three employees losing their jobs (which would cause hardship for their families). The painter was the only person in the business who held a licence, and he required to drive a van to transport his employees and equipment. This was held to be exceptional hardship.

Alternatively, if the disqualification would cause you extreme personal hardship, then the courts may consider that exceptional hardship has been established. In one case, a driver argued that if he was disqualified, he would lose his job, be unable to pay his mortgage and would lose his house, would be unable to pay a loan from his employers, and would probably result in the break-up of his marriage. The court considered that in the circumstances this was exceptional hardship. In another case, a full-time taxi driver in his forties successfully argued that if he was disqualified, he would lose his taxi licence which would take him up to ten years to regain. The court found that this amounted to exceptional hardship.

Other cases in which exceptional hardship was established

Mugaraneza v PF Glasgow (11 December 2008)

Driver’s business would come to an end and his three employees (including his wife) would lose their employment if he was disqualified. The court noted the importance to the driver’s family of his income and that of his wife, and the current economic climate.

Colgan v McDonald (1999)

Single mother with one son who had cerebral palsy and another who had behavioural difficulties which necessitated psychiatric treatment. Required to drive her sons to school and hospital, and generally transport them.

Findlay v Walkingshaw (1998)

Driver was a livestock driver who also had very specific skills, experience and duties who would be difficult to replace. Disqualification would have a significant impact on the driver’s employer.

Howdle v Davidson (1994)

Wife had a franchise of a car garage, which was effectively run by her husband, the driver. Strong possibility that driver would lose his job and his wife would lose the franchise, leaving the driver, his wife and their children without income. The security of the company would also be jeapordised, and so too would the employment of other staff.

Graham Walker

Graham Walker

Road Traffic Lawyer at RoadTrafficLaw.com
Road Traffic Lawyer: Graham Walker LLb,DipLP,NP

30 Years practising as a Criminal lawyer in Scotland. Specialising in road traffic law. Whatever the road traffic law problem is we are sure that we can help you. It may be about speed cameras, Speeding fines, penalty points. Call 0800 612 9597.
Graham Walker
Graham Walker
Graham Walker
Graham Walker

Latest posts by Graham Walker (see all)

Recent Case Results

Dangerous Driving at Hamilton Sheriff Court

Dangerous Driving at Hamilton Sheriff Court - Outcome 6 penalty points endorsed and £350 fine imposed[read more]

Dangerous Driving - Dunoon Sheriff Court

Dangerous Driving - Dunoon Sheriff Court - Outcome after negotiations with the Crown our client tendered a guilty plea to a substantially reduced charge of Careless driving Section 3 under deletion of the words did drive at “excessive speed” on the complaint , 8 penalty points endorsed and £325 fine.[read more]

Dangerous Driving – Glasgow Justice of the Peace Court

Dangerous Driving – Glasgow Justice of the Peace Court - outcome after negotiations with the Crown our client tendered a guilty plea to a much reduced charge of Section 3 careless driving 5 penalty points endorsed and £400 fine.[read more]